James Delingpol states in his Daily Telegraph blog that he doesn't see the connection between global warming, the Holocaust, and 9-11. James describes the Holocaust as an "evil Nazi genocide" which, he says, "led to the mechanised slaughter of six million mostly Jewish men, women and children".
Ranking alongside the Holocaust and 'global warming' scams is the 9-11 scam. Although James correctly states that the September 11 attacks were "a brutal terrorist incident which claimed the lives of 2,976 innocent people", I don't think he realises that the real culprits who executed this barbarous act of mass-murder were Jewish, not Muslim. The truth is often stranger than fiction.
James Delingpol describes himself as a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is "right about everything". James is certainly right about 'global warming' being a scam, but he is dead wrong about the Holocaust being an "evil Nazi genocide" that resulted in six million Jewish deaths. He's also wrong when he says that climate change has nothing to do with the Holocaust or 9/11. It most certainly has. Climate change is also a cruel hoax.
Teaching tolerance through "Holocaust education" in the public schools is now the law in cities, counties, and states across America. As revisionists are well aware, the standard account of the Jewish Holocaust taught in such courses is more than dubious. So too are the controversial methods, including "role playing" and similar types of psychological manipulation. But does Holocaust education really promote tolerance?
I recently had the opportunity to answer that question for myself when I visited the Simon Wiesenthal Center's Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles. And, since it is our children who are now the chief targets of "Holocaust education," I took my own two sons with me to gauge the museum's impact, and their reactions. Prior to our visit, I interviewed my sons on things the Museum of Tolerance regards as key issues for elementary school pupils. Their innocence was evident. They had no concept of Jewishness, were aware of no people or nation that was inherently evil, and knew of Hitler and the Nazis only what they had seen in Hollywood movies. They are both fifth-graders who attend a Catholic school in Mexico, and their outlook is entirely appropriate for their ages and life experience.
On a dreary Sunday morning in early March, we joined the long line for the Museum of Tolerance. Germar Rudolf, visiting town to discuss his role as an expert witness in David Irving's upcoming appeal, accompanied us. We waited, along with dozens of school groups, as each visitor was subjected to a security procedure more searching than any airport or border check I've ever experienced.
After a short explanation of how the tour would proceed, we were pointed toward two large doors. Above them, bright red neon signs designated one door "Not-Prejudiced," the other, "Prejudiced." On a nearby video, a rather sarcastic actor challenged the visitors to consider whether or not they were prejudiced. Then each of us was instructed to choose the door that matched our attitudes. As the already humbled mass ambled herd-like toward the "Prejudiced" portal, I opted to try the "Not-Prejudiced" door. It couldn't be opened -- it was fake. So began the brainwashing of yet another group of young Americans.
The first part of the tour is an emotional barrage of film clips and still photos showing racial strife, riots, and suffering Third World children. There may have been a European-American pictured without a Ku Klux Klan robe, but if there was I missed it. It hurt to see my sons viewing such violence and carnage, so I tried to rush them through as quickly as possible.
Then came the feature presentation, the Holocaust exhibit. The tour is self-guided, so there is no one to ask questions of, no one to challenge. The visitors simply go from one grayish display of mannequins and recorded "conversations" to another. All of them "explain" the political environment of 1930s Germany, without the least attempt at balance or accuracy. As Germar dryly commented after the causes of the Second World War had been neatly packed into a three-minute explanation, "They forgot to mention the Russian Revolution."
The third part of the tour is an emotional assault on the psyche. I watched my two sons gulp, their eyes wide, as they viewed the usual photographs of heaps of corpses and listened to recorded descriptions of diesel gassings, viewed photographs "ordinary" Germans said to have helped the Nazis shoot Jewish civilians, black and white films of people carrying all of their worldly belongings, and more. All of these images flash across multiple screens in a darkened room, and the students absorb them like sponges.
Then came the grand finale, a forty-five minute lecture from Elizabeth Mann, a self-professed Holocaust survivor, to a now traumatized roomful of students and teachers. At the end of her monologue I asked Mrs. Mann why she had told so many impressionable young people that the Germans made soap out of Jewish corpses during the Second World War, when even the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum says that wasn't so. She responded that she disagreed with the USHMM. How's that? Differences of opinion are one thing, but arguing for a heinous accusation that has never been substantiated, and is dismissed by virtually all historians as false, is quite another. But this was lost on the students.
I next asked Mrs. Mann why she had told her audience that the "gas chamber" at Auschwitz was a dual-purpose shower room, which could be converted into a homicidal gas chamber with the flip of a switch. The lethal gas, she had told us, came out of the showerheads. When I pointed out that all the "orthodox" Holocaust literature on Auschwitz describes only rooms into which the poison was dropped -- in granules -- through windows or holes in the roof, the room erupted into hisses and boos. Mrs. Mann, saved by the booing, made no response.
Once outside the lecture hall, the students called me over to ask me how I could possibly question such a sweet, elderly woman who had suffered so much. They accused me of calling her a liar. I was happy to explain to them, as a mother to her children, that I hadn't accused Mrs. Mann of lying. I had simply questioned some of the things that she had said. I looked out into the group and could see fear in some of the faces, as if they were being confronted by a lunatic with a gun, and I beseeched them to visit the USHMM's Internet Web site and read for themselves what that museum's authorities say about the soap libel, and about gassing at Auschwitz. When one of the teenagers asked me how I knew that soap wasn't made at Auschwitz, Germar, identifying himself as a chemist, told them calmly that it would have been physically impossible to make soap out of human fat in the buildings at Auschwitz. There had been no facilities for such an undertaking.
With each of our responses the group became more unruly, sarcastic, and intolerant. Rather than ask responsible questions or make clear arguments, at last they resorted to taunting us, calling Germar a Nazi and telling us to "f___ off." They frightened my sons, so we left, but not before they ended their outburst by chasing our van out of the underground parking lot. Their teacher was helpless to stop them, although she tried.
My sons and I learned a lesson at the Museum of Tolerance, a lesson about intolerance -- taxpayer-funded, state-sanctioned intolerance -- not merely of Germans and Christians and European-Americans, but also of intellectual curiosity and reasoned dissent. While I was able to "de-program" my sons with some healthy discussion and simple logic, I'm one of the fortunate few who have heard the revisionist side. If that angry mob of teenagers is indicative of the effect Holocaust studies have on our children, America risks schooling a generation in bigotry.
As one would expect, the airing of Inside Britain's Israel Lobby by Channel 4 last Monday evening has been met with the usual cries of "anti-Semitism". I thought that Irish4palestine's take on all the reactionary hullabaloo was worthy of a repost here...
Just as I'd expected and hoped for. The Channel 4 Dispatches program that investigated the Israeli Lobby in Britain is now experiencing the usual "hasbara" and "anti-Semitic" crapola. But, just as I expected this, I also expected the British people to come out swinging against what they surely saw as attempts to control Britain’s foreign policy, by and for a foreign power. And swinging they are. Why the pro-Israel writer at the Guardian wrote an Israeli Hasbara piece trashing Dispatches and as expected, hauled out the Anti-Semitic defence shield. This failed miserably, judging from the comments section under the article, a selection of my favourites which I will post below for your enjoyment, but first this:
C4's Dispatches on Britain's Israel lobby perpetuated the same old antisemitic
Aside from the shoddy research and the barely concealed antisemitic" undertones (the idea of a shady, morally repugnant "cabal" of Jews seeking to control the world is a classic antisemitic myth)
But then, context is always the problem. There was no effort throughout the programme to contextualise Operation Cast Lead in Gaza.
Before we get to the comments (below), I wonder just how it is that a person can "contextualise" genocide on an entire population. No doubt if one were to peruse the newspapers during Hitler's reign perhaps we would see some Nazi Hasbara Spreader writing the same sort of thing. But since he wants "contextualisation" I'll give it to him without saying one word:
CONTEXT #1:
CONTEXT #2:
Now, here are the responses from the British Public, enjoy:
• Mach1
18 Nov 2009, 4:12PM “C4's Dispatches on Britain's Israel lobby perpetuated the same old antisemitic myth”
Oh, has someone been criticising Israel again?
• Constituent
18 Nov 2009, 4:41PM Anti-semitism : opposition to people because of jewish ancestry or religion.
This is a form of racialism and completely unjustifiable.
Anti-zionism : opposition to the belief that people of jewish ancestry or religion are better than everyone else. This is a form of opposition to racialism and acceptable to all those who believe that all men are created equal.
• frangin
18 Nov 2009, 4:26PM
Charles Grant, in Friday's Guardian, asked "Why not tell the Israelis that if they forge a peace deal with the Palestinians, they could join the European Economic Area, giving Israel full access to the EU's single market?"
I have another suggestion. Why not tell the Israelis to get back to their pre-1967 borders as UN Security Council Resolution 242 demands, or face an EU embargo on their products and services? That would going a long way to defusing the criticisms of Israel, and public attitudes toward those who may appear to support a state given over to dividing people with Berlin-style walls and inhumanity of human relations akin to the old apartheid South Africa.
• stevehill
18 Nov 2009, 4:05PM
So in essence you can't actually contradict a single word of the Dispatches programme, so you resort to the default position (since you don't like it) that it is therefore by definition anti-semitic?
If all else fails, libel your critics. It's easier than acknowledging that maybe they have a point.
• sayonara2
18 Nov 2009, 4:31PM
Following the events of WWII, the world had sympathy for the Israelis. However they have behaved so abominably there is no sympathy left. Shouting anti Semitism is like South Africa claiming anti-white racism.
Any British citizen giving money to politicians to support a foreign country is committing treason and should go to jail.
• martinusher
18 Nov 2009, 4:10PM
Its all true. How does pointing it out make one anti-semitic?
The Israel lobby in the US is well known. Its far too powerful for our own good. Even mentioning it exists can get you into trouble.(note, he probably knows Pelosi LOL)
• corrocamino
18 Nov 2009, 4:10PM
"Anti-semitism" is a gag, not a statement.
• ShropsLad
18 Nov 2009, 4:14PM Here we go I knew it would come sooner or later knock Israel and your antisemitic.
I watched Dispatches and thought it raised some great questions. Obviously it disturbed you that someone was asking questions about foreign nationals having greater access to OUR parliament than most of its subjects.
I saw nothing wrong with it
• BreakingIllusions
18 Nov 2009, 4:27PM
ummmm....
If you build a wall around a community, with robot snipers pointing at people in their own homes, assassinating doctors, blockading all imports and exports thereby creating an embarco, arresting west bank citizens and then sending them to gaza instead of their homes in west bank thereby treating gaza as a prison or concentration camp guess what?????
You'll probably get rocks, rockets and the kitchen sink thrown at you. You think this is specific to palestine?
Go create an apartheid on Texas, see how texans respond.
You'll get rockets, missiles, shotguns and everything thrown at you. Honestly, the sympathy card is really getting old!
• Hornstein
18 Nov 2009, 4:28PM I was wondering when the apologist mob would be out claiming anti-semitism against the makers of this excellent and the very first expose of Israeli lobbies in this country.
Apparently, according to Channel 4's Dispatches programme on Monday night, there are some wealthy Jews out there bent on influencing British government policy on Israel. What is so shocking about it Mr. Boyd is that these people lobby on behalf of a foreign power and buy its influence in Parliament to such an extent to completely skew UK's ME policy in favour of its client. This wouldn't be so bad if it was a foreign power that had an ounce of respect for international law or the Geneva conventions. It insists on its illegal occupation, receives $7m a day in military aid and then unleashes that on its neighbours under one pretext or another and then has the audacity to claim itself a victim. And anybody who criticises its behaviour is immediately smeared, with apologists like yourself, with its most powerful weapon - the label of anti-semitism - so much so that it did not even spare its own fellow Jew and a very well respected international judge.
• tuttinski
18 Nov 2009, 4:37PM
Lobbyist should lobby using the power of their argument, not by throwing their money about. That is corruption in my book.
At 17:00 hours on Monday, 16th November 2009, Brendon O'Connell was arrested at his place of residence by western Australia police. Charges of 'conduct intended to incite racial vilification' and 'obstructing the police' have been made against Brendon. The police have confiscated Brendon's laptop and desktop machines along with his mobile phone, his video camera, and his passport. The police also seized documentation regarding his scheduled court hearing this coming Friday.
Brendon O'Connell's latest arrest came just seven hours after he had contacted detective Richard Paini to complain about files that had been permanently deleted from his laptop while the machine had been in police custody. Among the deleted files was the original footage of Brendon's encounter with Stanley Keyser.
Brendon states that he discovered detective Paini already inside his residence immediately prior to the police raid taking place. Detective Paini, however, claims that he entered the property via the side gate along with the other officers who participated in the raid.
Brendon believes that detective Paini is corrupt, and that the detective entered Brendon's residence before his fellow officers so that he could attempt to plant incriminating evidence which would frame Brendon. Brendon also believes that detective Paini is responsible for the severe hacking that has been occurring on Brendon's Internet connection. When Brendon confronted detective Paini over this matter, Brendon says that the detective smirked.
I hope to interview Brendon over the course of the next few days so that he can elaborate upon the facts of the matter. I am particularly curious to discover the grounds for which a warrant was issued for his arrest. I can only surmise that something he has written as of late hasn't gone down well with the western Australian police and Perth's Jewish community. Perhaps the warrant was issued with the sole intent of inducing adverse publicity ahead of Brendon's scheduled court hearing this Friday. Coming just four days before the hearing, the timing of the arrest is certainly suspicious.
Until such times as Brendon has a regular Internet connection, I will manage his blog on his behalf. I will post updates as and when they become available, so please check regularly. For further information, please visit FugaziQuo.Com,Whitelaw Towers, and Australia First.
Brendon O'Connell needs your support more than ever, and I call upon all genuine anti-Zionists and White Nationalists to join the fight. We must set aside any ideological, political and personal differences, and direct our focus exclusively upon our common enemy - racist, homicidal, maniac Jews and the stooges who serve their agenda.
It isn't just Brendon O'Connell's liberty that is at stake here - ultimately, yours is too.
First they came for the conservatives, and I did not speak out - because I was not a conservative; Then they came for the White Nationalist, and I did not speak out - because I was not a White Nationalist; Then they came for the Revisionists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Revisionist; Then they came for the Christians, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Christian; Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me.
"Nobody knows that Zionism appeared as a Marxist movement, a socialist one... Zionism is actually a revolution."
Sergei Lezov, scientist at the Soviet Academy of Science, Institute for Scientific Information - Strana i Mir magazine (Munich), No. 3, 1988, p. 94
"The ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism."
Jewish Chronicle, 4th April 1919 (London)
The following text was originally posted as a comment on another blog. But such is the eloquence and brilliance of the author's words that they merit reproduction here. Such fine work deserves to be seen by a broader audience.
Kudos to "Phil B" for his stunning commentary and analysis...
I must disagree with Kevin regarding the ability of anyone to convince the voting public that anything to do with guns is acceptable or normal. I personally do not believe that it is possible to peacefully reverse the restrictions and negative image of firearms in the UK for various reasons. Let me start from first principles to outline why I have come to this conclusion.
You must understand the nature of the Politicians, Quangos (Quasi Autonomous Non Governmental Organisations) and the Civil Service (which is neither civil or a servant but a Master). Ministers come and go and are briefed by the civil servants but it is the Civil Service which effectively runs the country.
It is overwhelmingly Marxist/Leninist in its ethos and has been infiltrated so successfully by the left that the average citizen (or even a group of such citizens) does not even understand the rules of the game.
Communism can be simply and easily summarised: "A group of PROFESSIONAL Revolutionaries, taking over the levers of power of a country and running the country for their own benefit". How will they mange this? By organisation and eliminating opposition by whatever means is necessary.
Briefly, the left wing intent is to destroy the existing society and replace it with a society of its own design.
Lenin proposed five conditions for successful "Revolution", namely :
1) The weakening or destruction of the existing State and its institutions.
2) The destruction of the existing society so that it can be replaced by the type of society required by the "new" post revolutionary society.
3) An inability of the existing institutions to govern or bring about change.
4) The armed forces must be demoralised and rendered ineffective (including the Police).
5) The "proletariat" must be in a mood for change.
He also stated that Freedom and Liberty is precious and therefore must be strictly rationed. All power must be accumulated to the State and freedoms and rights will be permitted ONLY if the State allows.
Once you understand that mindset and these principles, then you can use them as a template to see how many of the trends in society fit the pattern and "advance the cause". The destruction of marriage, the recent posting on this blog about the way all parents are to be treated as paedophiles, the wrecking of the education system, "equality" legislation, gay and minority rights etc and so forth ad infinitum all assist one or more of the five principles. Try matching the attack to the principle.
Interestingly, Lenin did not prescribe what form the revolution takes or how it is prosecuted. Everyone thinks of the "Revolution" as armed people storming the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg (or Leningrad if your atlas is a bit older). However, he also said that ALL aspects of society should be attacked simultaneously and if an opportunity arises to spring the revolution, then it should be taken. If the communists can actually take over the Government of the day and run the country for its own use, then that is also considered as "revolution" and equally valid.
The left wing has infiltrated and hollowed out from within just about every organisation - including the Conservative party ("Right" wing or Republican) which is "Blue Labour" – their policies and attitude is a milder version of the Left policies and attitudes. As a "for example" I will quote from Mary Ellen Synons blog "Euroseptic"
Tony Blair promised the British people a referendum on the European Constitution. Then, after the text was renamed the Lisbon Treaty, Blair broke that promise because he said it was no longer a constitution, it was a treaty, and he had only promised a referendum on a constitution.
David Cameron promised the British people a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Now, after the text has been signed by President Klaus of the Czech Republic, Cameron has broken that promise -- he has sent out his Tory spokesmen to say there will not be a referendum because Lisbon is not a treaty, it is now European law, and he only promised a referendum on a treaty.
Do you spot the similarities?
In the UK. The brothers Milliband (both professional politicians who have never had a job outside of Politics) and are the sons of Ralph Milliband, an ardent and active communist, are holders of significant power in the UK. David Milliband is Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. Edward Samuel Miliband is Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. Ralph Milliband was attacked by David Horowitz in an essay called "The Road to Nowhere" and Kevin blogged this a while back.
Examining the political credentials of the rest of the Government Ministers reveals a similar catalogue of "ex" Marxist/Leninists in significant positions of power and influence.
A revolution? I believe it certainly is and all the conditions listed above have been very largely been achieved.
The Daily Mail newspaper reported that Labour has deliberately encouraged "multiculturism" and unlimited mass immigration to destroy British society and forever change Britain to spite the right wing. As the newspaper concerned has not been sued by the Labour party or the Government or forced to issue a public retraction of the statement that I can only assume that it must be true.
However, there has been a deafening silence from the rest of the press and as the majority of people rely on the TV for news and the BBC (the state sponsored broadcasting organisation) in particular, very few people are aware of this.
This addresses Point two above examining the relentless attacks on marriage from a myriad of different directions (removing tax breaks for married couples, elevating the "single parent family" by favourable benefits so that it is financially more beneficial for a married couple with children to LIVE APART, the elevation of gay "Marriage" etc.) add to this.
Constant change and bogging people down in pointless activities contributes to points two and three – Markadelphia is expert at this. Consider the amount of time that the readers of this blog have wasted in rebutting in detail his postings – while you are busy researching facts, carefully editing replies and spending your time and effort concentrating on the garbage he writes, you are not concentrating on other, perhaps much more important things. "Make the enemy do useless things" is one of Sun Tzu's maxims. And while you are doing this, he, like a butterfly, flutters off onto another topic, equally as pointless and you respond...
What you must bear in mind is that for a professional revolutionary, infiltrated into an organisation, IT IS THEIR FULL TIME JOB to work towards the destruction of society. Kevin, all the rest of the bloggers and I must devote our spare time to this – a revolutionary can work 8 hours a day at the office and then go home to carry on in their leisure time.
My point is that, regardless of your arguments, no matter how detailed your research, no matter how much you can demonstrate that your point of view is reasonable, it will be ignored, dismissed and trivialised. Critical Theory so well developed by the Frankfurt school of Communism will be brought fully to bear to render your arguments invalid ("You are wrong")
The existing State holds the levers of power and they certainly are not going to give it up – remember, rights will be allowed if the State is convinced that it will not be harmed by the relaxation and can be withdrawn at any time.
You might as well try to persuade by sweet reason a hungry grizzly bear to turn vegetarian and not eat you. It is not interested, its mind is made up and you are wasting your time.
Now, having outlined the methodology of the Left and given some examples to illustrate the way that the left operates, let us examine how they have used Critical Theory in particular to shape the way firearms are viewed in the UK.
Since 1920, the propaganda output by all the British media, both State controlled and privately owned, has been that Guns are evil. Gun "Nuts/Fanatics/Crazy" people have been (and still are) the target of all the insidious destruction of their reputation and character which the left practices so well.
Using Critical Theory, firearms and owners are attacked and trivialised at every opportunity.
Rich, upper class people shooting grouse and pheasants (I am neither rich or upper class but have shot both pheasants and grouse on a very modest budget) can be dismissed using the "Class Enemy" approach and vilified as brainless, moronic bloodthirsty destroyers of the environment (when not clearing the peasants from their land so that a privileged minority can lord it over the country for their own sadistic pleasure, of course).
So inculcated are the populace and so selective are the reports presented by the media ("Look what happens in America") that anyone would think that an intelligent, sober, sensible, law abiding person merely touching a gun would instantaneously be transmogrified into a drooling, crazed murdering chimpanzee on acid and not to be trusted with a gun.
The press and media are so left wing leaning and biased against firearms that getting the message out will be virtually impossible.
The Police have actively campaigned for the restriction on firearms since the beginning in 1920. Their mantra is “We wish to reduce the number of firearms in the hands of the population to the absolute minimum” – and if you believe any number north of zero is "the minimum", then you are as gullible as Markadelphia.
Thanks to the Police, taking anyone to a range to introduce them to the sport is lengthy, tedious, bureaucratic and intended to put people off. Journalists have stated that they want to infiltrate a gun club and "prove" how easy it is to steal a gun. (A few years back, a journalist smuggled a gun into the UK to "prove" how easy it wa... and was not prosecuted for breaking the law). The penalties for having a gun stolen are severe and you can bet your bottom dollar that you will never own a gun again. Any Gun Club where the firearm is stolen will be shut down. More ammunition will be provided to "prove" that firearms owners are a danger. As you must vouch for anyone you take to the club, very, very few people will risk things and even fewer clubs will encourage visitors.
Gun ownership is being attacked and strangled from many directions and few people will be willing to risk introducing anyone to a club, or even discuss that they are firearms owners in case loose talk leads to a break in and theft of a firearm.
Samizdata has a blog entry describing the evolution of the "no right to self defence" (link here: http://tinyurl.com/yf5rz99) and it summarises how and why it is impossible to use a legally held firearm in self defence (besides the conditions on the firearms certificate will state "Only to be used on Approved ranges", or a named piece of land for shooting rabbits etc. so you will be breaking the law by doing so).
So to conclude, the decline in forearms ownership in Britain will only continue, and indeed accelerate as people are forced out of the sport and no new people come into the clubs etc. and those in charge of the system will be quite content to allow this BECAUSE it is what they want. Chairman Mao stated that "Power comes from the barrel of a gun" and there is no way in the world that these people will allow power to be given to the population.
So will there ever be a change in this status? I believe so but as I said at the start of this essay, it will not be PEACEFUL.
There is an interesting book called the War of the Flea by Robert Taber about revolutionary guerrilla warfare. It was published a while ago in the 1960s and the CIA bought up the entire first printing – not because it was so dangerous that the Public couldn't be allowed access to it but it was so good it was issued as a standard text to their operatives. I often used to see it in second hand bookshops in the UK.
One of the questions Taber asked was "Why do people, when the risks and dangers are so great, both to themselves and their families, resort to armed revolution?"
His answer was quite simple – they cannot get any redress to their grievances either through the ballot box or through the Courts.
In the UK such topics as the Lisbon treaty, law and order, taxation, the deliberate encouragement of immigration to destroy the nature of the country, loss of liberties, ID cards, etc. etc. are occurring at an accelerating rate and the average citizen is bewildered by this. The torrent of legislation and the pettiness and disproportionate penalties for trivial transgressions of the law is proceeding unabated. The labour government, through "Enabling Acts" (i.e. under existing legislation a Minister can introduce a law without it being scrutinised or voted on by parliament) has introduced one new criminal offence for EVERY DAY they have been in power since May 1997. Such legislation has given the state unprecedented power to snoop and spy on the population and now it is more expensive to obey the law than to be a criminal.
The citizens do not understand the rules of the game being played by the left. They try to understand and reason their way to a solution – and while they are trying to address and counter the arguments and problems in detail and try to lobby their "representatives", they are overwhelmed by the new legislation coming down the pipeline. The representatives will ignore or trivialise the citizens letter or enquiry – they are driving the process – and will divide and conquer using Critical Theory, accusations of Racism, Homophobia, Islamophobia etc. No matter, it helps destroy and fragment society and isolate people, engender suspicion and any "problems" can be sorted later (such as declaring sections of the population as counter revolutionaries, class enemies, etc. The solution involves firing squads or Gulags but it must be kept firmly in mind that the purpose of it all is for a SMALL group of PROFESSIONAL revolutionaries to run the country for THEIR benefit. See any communist country and the way the leaders behave.
Is there any redress through the ballot box? All political parties are singing from the same hymn sheet and Europe is gaining greater and greater (unelected and unaccountable) powers – see the quote by Mary Ellen Synon above.
Is there any chance of the Law Courts siding with the people of the country and reversing the Governments policies? Again, no. Rather they uphold stupid and malicious legislation. And any situation where it costs you more to obey the law than to disregard it is a dangerous situation. Some of the judgements are frankly bizarre and perverse to say the least and discriminate in favour of "minorities" and against the law abiding (as a "for example" search for "Travellers" on the Daily mail website for dozens of examples of this).
The mood of the people when I left in late January 2009 was becoming increasingly frustrated and angry. Society is so fragmented now that there is no longer a sense of national identity and people now have nothing to lose.
If you accept that Taber was correct (regarding ballot boxes and the law courts) then you must conclude that revolution in the UK is inevitable.
I learned that to avoid trouble, don't be there when it kicks off and I believe that Britain is heading for a revolution of one form or another because the pressures and change in society are so great that it is at breaking point. What will replace that particular version of society is anyone's guess but I can guarantee it will be a less benign, harsher and more impoverished existence. Revolutions destroy wealth and stability and I’m getting too old to start from scratch again. That is why I am writing this in New Zealand.
HOW the revolution starts (without guns in the hands of the people it will be difficult, but not impossible) and what direction it takes I would not like to predict. It will be bloody, long and protracted - but sweeping away of the old regime and the replacement with a new form of governance will be something to observe from afar.
You can bet that those people who have put their life on the line to get rid of the corrupt, non representative and self serving system will not meekly hand in their weapons to those in the new authority. Instead, they will be as brutal as the Communists and quite a few of the existing Politicians, Civil Servants and others will meet an untimely end in one form or another.
So is there hope? That's a strange way of looking at it but perhaps there is.
As usual, you will want to know where the information comes from.
For a concise and easily read summary of the aims and principles of communism, Geoffrey Fairbairn's "Revolutionary Guerrilla Warfare The Countryside Version" is as good as you will get. One chapter on Leninism sums it up completely in 19 pages of a paperback.
Chairman Maos quotes are found in my copy of "Mao Tse Tung – Selected Writings" which is surprisingly readable and well written. Not that I would be persuaded to subscribe to his philosophy.
Lenin's works are too numerous to list in all their gory detail but the following are worthwhile to understand the way communist organisations are set up, organised and run. Note that Lenin had experience of the Army and organisation so if his writings seem to be written as a military textbook, referring to "This Army", now you know why. His acceptance and insistence on the use of overwhelming violence stems from his Military Training and may give an insight into the tactics of the left wing political parties. Try these two as a primer.
On Organisation
Selected Works
Incidentally, if Lenin DID write this stuff, he was an excellent technical author.
Sun Tsu – The Art of War. I prefer the translation by Samuel B Griffiths (a former US Marine) but there are plenty more out there.
The Daily Mail is a large circulation newspaper with over 3 million readers per day (see the Audited Bureau of Circulation Website for exact figures. Make sure you enter the full title as there are thousands of newspapers with Mail as part of the title) and covers some of the stupidities of the various laws passed over the last 13 years. Try entering BNP as a search string in the website and read some of the comments under the articles. Or "Travellers" for the way the law abiding are second class citizens in their own homes.
Samizdata is, I find, patchy and does not cover a single topic (as Kevin's Blog does) but in the right hand sidebar, you can search under TOPICS for self defence etc. Plenty of British points of view.
According to the Israeli philosophy professor Yeshayahu Leibowitz, the 'Holocaust' is a new religion. Leibowitz' countrymen Shraga Elam, Gilad Atzmon, Yoshua Shalev and others have further developed this concept, reasoning like this: Most Jews today are either atheists or shun the religion of Judaism. Therefore, the Jewish people had to adopt belief in the 'Holocaust' as their new religion. They have spread this religion all over the world. 'Holocaust' museums are the new houses of worship and are present in most major cities. The new religion has its commandments, its decrees, its prophets, its high priests, its circle of saints, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It knows neither mercy, nor forgiveness, nor clemency but only the duty of vengeance. If you question the 'Holocaust Religion', you will go to prison.
The 'Ten Commandments' of this 'Holocaust Religion' may be enunciated as follows:
1. Remember what Amalek (the Non-Jews) has done to thee.
2. Thou shalt never compare THE HOLOCAUST with any other Genocide.
3. Thou shalt never compare the Nazi crimes with those of Israel.
4. Thou shalt never doubt the number of 6 million Jewish victims.
5. Thou shalt never doubt that the majority of them died in gas chambers.
6. Thou shalt not doubt the central role of SATAN Hitler in the extermination of the Jews.
7. Thou shalt never doubt the right of Israel to exist as the Jewish state.
8. Thou shalt not criticize the leading Jewish organizations and the Israeli government.
9. Thou must never criticize Jewish organizations and the Zionist leadership for abandoning the European Jewry in the Nazi era.
10.Thou shalt take these commandments literally and never show mercy to them that doubt!
William At Five Years Old Has Been Branded A Racist (Source)
Let me tell you about William. He is a very bright child and comes from a nice home. William is extremely polite, courteous and a very normal healthy child. William has a friend called Zoe. She is Asian but William and Zoe are inseparable in the Surrey school they go to near Bagshot.
However last week, Zoe and William had an argument in which William used the term 'Zoe Bin Laden'. Zoe is not a Moslem but a Thomasian Christian, one of the oldest Christian sects in the world alongside the Copts in Egypt.
Zoe's mother, Maria, received a phone call about a very serious matter indeed and it could not be discussed on the phone and the Police might be involved, subject to our discussions today - that is if you come right now?' William's mother Carol also received a phone call about 'a very serious matter'.
Almost panicking, both mothers rushed to the local school. I have changed the locations because the matter is still being investigated. Be content that it is somewhere in Surrey close to where I live. I know both women personally and both are well educated and well balanced. At the school they were almost frogmarched into the presence of the School Manager who sat behind a desk accompanied by a Police Officer - in fact I learned later there were two of them.
William's mother was already there but her son had been isolated in a special room away from all other children. The school refused to allow his mother access to him. She complained but was only allowed to see a very frightened and tearful little boy after she had been 'interrogated' (in her own words) by the officers and the Manager.
Zoe's mother was made to wait while William's mother was seen first. It was obvious the school were interested in William's other attitudes and that of his father, a car dealer. Eventually she was asked to wait outside and Zoe's mother was asked to go in, where it was explained that the 'very serious matter' concerned her daughter being called 'Zoe Bin Laden'.
Trying not to laugh, Maria asked why should such a trivial childish bit of name calling result in such excessive behaviour by the school? The Manager replied that the school took racist incidents very seriously. The Police were not officially involved at that moment dependent upon their 'preliminary inquiries.'
Maria asked the School Manager if this was 'some kind of prank or perhaps a surprise birthday gram' as it was her 43 birthday? It soon dawned upon her that the school was quite serious.
Maria is rather fiery by nature and does not suffer fools gladly. She like a lot of Indians is quite plain spoken.
'Are you telling me that my daughter’s best friend is being accused of racism?'
'Yes!'
'Are you sick in the head Head Mistress- two five year old children for heaven's sake? A child cannot differentiate between one race and another- he probably heard it on the radio or TV! Please tell me this is not a wind up?'
'No it is not!'
Maria demanded to see her daughter immediately and despite refusals, the child was eventually brought to her. She took her daughter's hand and removed her from the school. She told the school that she had no intention of returning her and that she would continue to play with William. The school said she could not do this and that matters might be made worse if she did so.
She asked if they were threatening her?
'No but we might have to bring in the social services!'
It was then that she noticed her friend and William’s mother in the room with a crying child.
She entered the 'quiet room' where little William was incarcerated. The Manager tried to stop the friends having contact.
Mary told the woman to 'shut up' and went into see Carol and William. The little boy crying like mad hanging on to his mother for life and clearly terrified said, 'I didn't mean to be naughty mummy and auntie Carol, please tell the teacher that! Please mum ... I didn’t mean to be nasty to Zoe!'
The women immediately took the children despite protests of the school - the Police were clearly embarrassed apparently when it was clear the school was exaggerating - and the women left the school. Neither William or Zoe will be returning.
Yesterday, both mothers received letters from Social Services to make an appointment to see the families concerned and both are now 'under investigation'. The school also wrote a letter to Zoe stating that William's remarks would 'remain on his school record'.
In English Law a child under 10 years is incapable of committing a crime.
The original recording was pulled for some strange reason. The intention of this recording is to try and prevent in some small way a possible false flag operation on the Australia's Military Eyes and Ears namely the Electronic Warfare Unit based on the Darling Downs. If something goes down well we have done what we think is the right thing.
Now we are not saying that all employees of Seacret are Mossad. But evidence does suggest that Mossad may be using Israeli Companies as a front. Its not like we haven't heard of the failed attack on a Military base in Sydney now is it. Nothing like a precedent to set the stage. So just have a sticky beak next time you are out shopping with the Mrs. You know the drill milk, bread, Mossad agent:)
We can tell you that the shopping center operation that was interviewed in February packed up and left and didn't return until recently. The guy there now looks even less likely to be a hand cream salesman.
In this day and age of nothing surprises us anymore we offer you this.
Now if you are concerned and you haven't got what it takes to ask questions don't panic. If you feel you need to do something or help out try donating some money to a good cause. Drop in here and help out a fellow Aussie.
http://brendonoconnell.blogspot.com
More Dollars = More Activist Activity.
Here is the original story from Whitelaw Towers.
Mossad alive and well at a Shopping Centre Near You Pt2
Well that didn't take long readers. Our first cab off the rank is from Toowoomba QLD. A little back ground on Toowoomba first. Toowoomba is the largest regional city in Australia and is situated about 120 km west of Brisbane. From what we have been told it has a few strategic bases situated in and around it. In Toowoomba itself we have the 25/49 Darling Downs Infantry Battalion. 20km north of Toowoomba well what do you know we have the Australian Army Navy Air Force Electronic Warfare Unit at Cabala. Interesting, it would seem that they are the eyes and ears of our Defense in Northern Australia. Next we have The Army Aviation stationed at Oakey that is 20km west of Toowoomba. So yeah its a bit of hub for our Defense forces.
"We have uncovered and have in our possession, detailed evidence of harassment by the Anti-Defamation League. The ADL are operating out of a political forum called Argue With Everyone. This forum is owned and operated by a Texas-based lawyer named Kevin Kneupper. Concrete proof that Kneupper owns Argue With Everyone is contained in this zip file."
"The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God's chosen children and thus, on God Himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded in the Bible; and like it's direct opposite, which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation."
Abraham Foxman - director of Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith - Frontline - January 1994
In order to perpetuate the Holocaust myth, Jewish propagandists and their sympathisers are compelled to use the state education system to implant their propaganda in the minds of young British students because the seemingly endless list of Holocaust 'survivors' aren't going to be surviving for much longer. And when these 'survivors' do finally depart this mortal coil, so too does their 'testimony'. Very soon, there will be no more Holocaust 'survivors' left alive.
Auschwitz though, will be preserved at any cost. The Shoah must go on. You can bet your last shekel that this dilapidated labour camp and tourist attraction will remain standing so that young British students can visit and see for themselves the gas chamber and crematorium 1, both of which are shown to visitors as evidence of the 'mass extermination' of Jews that supposedly took place there. It is extremely doubftul though, whether young British students and tourists will be told that these particular sections of the labour camp were built AFTER the second world war had ended. In 2006, the International Auschwitz Council decided to modernise what they say is a 51-year-old exhibition at the Auschwitz labour camp so to prevent the ruins of gas chambers from sinking into the ground. Do the math!
I wonder what answers would be forthcoming if one were to assemble a group of schoolkids and ask them if they knew that the Nazis made soap out of Jews, if they were aware of lampshades having been made from the skin of Jews, or if they had ever heard of hair shaven from prisoners at Auschwitz being used to make textiles. I also wonder what response would be given if one where to ask whether they believed the AnneFrankdiary to be true, or just another Holocaust myth. Anyone reading this piece who might have previously believed any of these hoaxes, or in the mythical holocaust itself, can always blame their imagination for the lapse.
Some pro-Israel gay Canadian named Fred states in his blog that education in the UK is "getting worse by the minute", and advocates Holocaust 'education'. Although the British education system does indeed have many shortcomings, the results of the poll undertaken by the London Jewish Cultural Centre indicate that those who are pushing Jewish propaganda on our kids via Holocaust 'education' aren't succeeding in getting their message across. Whether this is directly attributable to the inherent failings of the state education system, or down to young Britons being completely uninterested in events that occurred over sixty years ago is a moot point, although I'd bet on the latter scenario being the case.
If we are to teach our children in a scholarly, academic fashion, then we must ensure that they learn to study competing arguments, and to weigh-up the evidence presented in each before reaching any conclusions. The presentation of one argument to the exclusion of all others is not education but indoctrination. If the horrors of the second world war are to be fully understood, then the full story has to be told. It wasn't just Jews who suffered, although one could be forgiven for thinking otherwise since this is where all the focus is directed. What about the Armenian holocaust, the Ukranian holocaust and the Cambodian Holocaust? What about the German Holocaust? What of the Indian Holocaust? And what about the murder of millions of Christians and gentiles in Russia and Eastern Europe by Judaic Communists? Did the victims of these Holocausts not suffer?
According to Foxman, the Holocaust is "something different." For Foxman, the Holocaust "is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God's chosen children and thus, on God Himself." In Foxman's perverted view, Jewish suffering during the second world war is a somehow unique phenomenon. It is not. 56,125,262 people lost their lives as a consequence of world war two. Even if we accept six million as a true figure for the amount of Jewish losses, that figure would represent just over 9% of the death count. Foxman pays great disrespect to the the gentiles whose lives were claimed by the second world war when he claims that Jewish losses were "something different". They were not.
Foxman's claim of the Jews being God's "chosen" people is bogus. Only 20% of world Jewry has the right to legitimately call itself Jewish. The overwhelming majority of 'Jews' are actually the descendants of eastern Europeans, and not descendants of Abraham, but don't expect young British students to ever be taught anything about four-fifths of modern-day Jews being the descendants of the Khazars - converts to Judaism. Just as Jews consider the Holocaust to be "something different", they also perceive themselves with same warped vision. The Judaic claim of them being "God's chosen people" implies that God has given the Jews a privileged position which places them at the very top of the human pecking-order. But this falsehood is easily debunked.
Since the Jews are not a race, how then has it been possible for their 'special' status to have been maintained over several millenniums? Having already eliminated the option of this having been achieved genetically, and since the state of Israel did not exist prior to its' creation by UN charter in 1948, the only other possibile explanation that remains is that the Jews have preserved their 'special' status over the course of thousands of years via religious means. However, the Mizrahi Jews - otherwise known as Oriental Jews - are the direct descendants of the Jews who existed in biblical times, and since Palestinians believe that they are descended from these ancient Jews; if it is true that the 'chosen people' status is genetically transmitted, then the Palestinians are the chosen ones, not the Jews. The claim of the Jews being "God's chosen people" is demonstrably false, and something that young British students need to learn.
Although the standard of numerical skills being taught in British schools is undeniably quite atrocious, Jewish maths is more atrocious still. In January 1988, a German Television broadcast, "Vor Vierzig Jahren", contained an entire newsreel titled "Welt im Filmthat". This German newsreel had been released forty years earlier, and contained a report which focused on the closing scenes of the Krakow Auschwitz Trial that took place in the latter part of 1947. The report stated that: "altogether nearly 300,000 people from the most different nations died in the Auschwitz concentration camp." The plaque pictured below was on display at the Auschwitz labour camp between 1948 and 1989. The obvious question here is: where did the extra 3.7 million dead Jews appear from?
And the obvious question that one must ask after observing the plaque pictured below - presently on display at Auschwitz - is: why have two and-a-half million dead Jews disappeared?
Although this plaque commemorates 1.5 million Jews who are said to have died at Auschwitz, in 1996, however, Polish authorities reduced their estimate of the Auschwitz death count from four million to just over one million although the Polish government has since revised the figure yet again and upped it to 1.5 million. How ironic it is that Holocaust revisionists are persecuted while revsionism has quite evidently been undertaken by 'official' revisionists. So, how many Jews did actually perish at Auschwitz? Decide for yourself after perusing the information to be found here. You can choose any number between 135,000 and 9,000,000 including that elusive six million figure.
From the front page of the 17th October 1943 edition of the British newspaper The People
It can be seen that the Holocaust 'education' young British students are currently receiving is based on weird science and flawed arithmetic. The knowledge being imparted to young British students in respect of the Holocaust is not being transmitted via education but via indoctrination. For the Holocaust hoax to continue, the Jews and the lackeys who serve their agenda must target young minds early. "Get' em young, keep 'em for life" is the means to this particular end. It is encouraging though, to discover that the Jewish propaganda being implanted in young, fertile British minds is not being fully absorbed by the target audience. Revisionists can draw hope and endeavour to make sure that the truth prevails. Who knows, maybe at some future point we'll be hearing of how kids think Auschwitz is a type of hoax.
Posts
