A Superb Analysis

"Nobody knows that Zionism appeared as a Marxist movement, a socialist one... Zionism is actually a revolution."

Sergei Lezov, scientist at the Soviet Academy of Science, Institute for Scientific Information - Strana i Mir magazine (Munich), No. 3, 1988, p. 94

"The ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism."

Jewish Chronicle, 4th April 1919 (London)

The following text was originally posted as a comment on another blog. But such is the eloquence and brilliance of the author's words that they merit reproduction here. Such fine work deserves to be seen by a broader audience.

Kudos to "Phil B" for his stunning commentary and analysis...

I must disagree with Kevin regarding the ability of anyone to convince the voting public that anything to do with guns is acceptable or normal. I personally do not believe that it is possible to peacefully reverse the restrictions and negative image of firearms in the UK for various reasons. Let me start from first principles to outline why I have come to this conclusion.

You must understand the nature of the Politicians, Quangos (Quasi Autonomous Non Governmental Organisations) and the Civil Service (which is neither civil or a servant but a Master). Ministers come and go and are briefed by the civil servants but it is the Civil Service which effectively runs the country.

It is overwhelmingly Marxist/Leninist in its ethos and has been infiltrated so successfully by the left that the average citizen (or even a group of such citizens) does not even understand the rules of the game.

Communism can be simply and easily summarised: "A group of PROFESSIONAL Revolutionaries, taking over the levers of power of a country and running the country for their own benefit". How will they mange this? By organisation and eliminating opposition by whatever means is necessary.

Briefly, the left wing intent is to destroy the existing society and replace it with a society of its own design.

Lenin proposed five conditions for successful "Revolution", namely :

1) The weakening or destruction of the existing State and its institutions.

2) The destruction of the existing society so that it can be replaced by the type of society required by the "new" post revolutionary society.

3) An inability of the existing institutions to govern or bring about change.

4) The armed forces must be demoralised and rendered ineffective (including the Police).

5) The "proletariat" must be in a mood for change.

He also stated that Freedom and Liberty is precious and therefore must be strictly rationed. All power must be accumulated to the State and freedoms and rights will be permitted ONLY if the State allows.

Once you understand that mindset and these principles, then you can use them as a template to see how many of the trends in society fit the pattern and "advance the cause". The destruction of marriage, the recent posting on this blog about the way all parents are to be treated as paedophiles, the wrecking of the education system, "equality" legislation, gay and minority rights etc and so forth ad infinitum all assist one or more of the five principles. Try matching the attack to the principle.

Interestingly, Lenin did not prescribe what form the revolution takes or how it is prosecuted. Everyone thinks of the "Revolution" as armed people storming the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg (or Leningrad if your atlas is a bit older). However, he also said that ALL aspects of society should be attacked simultaneously and if an opportunity arises to spring the revolution, then it should be taken. If the communists can actually take over the Government of the day and run the country for its own use, then that is also considered as "revolution" and equally valid.

The left wing has infiltrated and hollowed out from within just about every organisation - including the Conservative party ("Right" wing or Republican) which is "Blue Labour" – their policies and attitude is a milder version of the Left policies and attitudes. As a "for example" I will quote from Mary Ellen Synons blog "Euroseptic"

(Original here: http://tinyurl.com/ybl8p8a)

Tony Blair promised the British people a referendum on the European Constitution. Then, after the text was renamed the Lisbon Treaty, Blair broke that promise because he said it was no longer a constitution, it was a treaty, and he had only promised a referendum on a constitution.

David Cameron promised the British people a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Now, after the text has been signed by President Klaus of the Czech Republic, Cameron has broken that promise -- he has sent out his Tory spokesmen to say there will not be a referendum because Lisbon is not a treaty, it is now European law, and he only promised a referendum on a treaty.

Do you spot the similarities?

In the UK. The brothers Milliband (both professional politicians who have never had a job outside of Politics) and are the sons of Ralph Milliband, an ardent and active communist, are holders of significant power in the UK. David Milliband is Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. Edward Samuel Miliband is Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change. Ralph Milliband was attacked by David Horowitz in an essay called "The Road to Nowhere" and Kevin blogged this a while back.

Examining the political credentials of the rest of the Government Ministers reveals a similar catalogue of "ex" Marxist/Leninists in significant positions of power and influence.

A revolution? I believe it certainly is and all the conditions listed above have been very largely been achieved.

The Daily Mail newspaper reported that Labour has deliberately encouraged "multiculturism" and unlimited mass immigration to destroy British society and forever change Britain to spite the right wing. As the newspaper concerned has not been sued by the Labour party or the Government or forced to issue a public retraction of the statement that I can only assume that it must be true.

See here: http://tinyurl.com/yj3tv7a

and

http://tinyurl.com/yl7k5kq for details.

However, there has been a deafening silence from the rest of the press and as the majority of people rely on the TV for news and the BBC (the state sponsored broadcasting organisation) in particular, very few people are aware of this.

This addresses Point two above examining the relentless attacks on marriage from a myriad of different directions (removing tax breaks for married couples, elevating the "single parent family" by favourable benefits so that it is financially more beneficial for a married couple with children to LIVE APART, the elevation of gay "Marriage" etc.) add to this.

Constant change and bogging people down in pointless activities contributes to points two and three – Markadelphia is expert at this. Consider the amount of time that the readers of this blog have wasted in rebutting in detail his postings – while you are busy researching facts, carefully editing replies and spending your time and effort concentrating on the garbage he writes, you are not concentrating on other, perhaps much more important things. "Make the enemy do useless things" is one of Sun Tzu's maxims. And while you are doing this, he, like a butterfly, flutters off onto another topic, equally as pointless and you respond...

What you must bear in mind is that for a professional revolutionary, infiltrated into an organisation, IT IS THEIR FULL TIME JOB to work towards the destruction of society. Kevin, all the rest of the bloggers and I must devote our spare time to this – a revolutionary can work 8 hours a day at the office and then go home to carry on in their leisure time.

My point is that, regardless of your arguments, no matter how detailed your research, no matter how much you can demonstrate that your point of view is reasonable, it will be ignored, dismissed and trivialised. Critical Theory so well developed by the Frankfurt school of Communism will be brought fully to bear to render your arguments invalid ("You are wrong")

The existing State holds the levers of power and they certainly are not going to give it up – remember, rights will be allowed if the State is convinced that it will not be harmed by the relaxation and can be withdrawn at any time.

You might as well try to persuade by sweet reason a hungry grizzly bear to turn vegetarian and not eat you. It is not interested, its mind is made up and you are wasting your time.

Now, having outlined the methodology of the Left and given some examples to illustrate the way that the left operates, let us examine how they have used Critical Theory in particular to shape the way firearms are viewed in the UK.

Since 1920, the propaganda output by all the British media, both State controlled and privately owned, has been that Guns are evil. Gun "Nuts/Fanatics/Crazy" people have been (and still are) the target of all the insidious destruction of their reputation and character which the left practices so well.

Using Critical Theory, firearms and owners are attacked and trivialised at every opportunity.

Rich, upper class people shooting grouse and pheasants (I am neither rich or upper class but have shot both pheasants and grouse on a very modest budget) can be dismissed using the "Class Enemy" approach and vilified as brainless, moronic bloodthirsty destroyers of the environment (when not clearing the peasants from their land so that a privileged minority can lord it over the country for their own sadistic pleasure, of course).

So inculcated are the populace and so selective are the reports presented by the media ("Look what happens in America") that anyone would think that an intelligent, sober, sensible, law abiding person merely touching a gun would instantaneously be transmogrified into a drooling, crazed murdering chimpanzee on acid and not to be trusted with a gun.

The press and media are so left wing leaning and biased against firearms that getting the message out will be virtually impossible.

The Police have actively campaigned for the restriction on firearms since the beginning in 1920. Their mantra is “We wish to reduce the number of firearms in the hands of the population to the absolute minimum” – and if you believe any number north of zero is "the minimum", then you are as gullible as Markadelphia.

Thanks to the Police, taking anyone to a range to introduce them to the sport is lengthy, tedious, bureaucratic and intended to put people off. Journalists have stated that they want to infiltrate a gun club and "prove" how easy it is to steal a gun. (A few years back, a journalist smuggled a gun into the UK to "prove" how easy it wa... and was not prosecuted for breaking the law). The penalties for having a gun stolen are severe and you can bet your bottom dollar that you will never own a gun again. Any Gun Club where the firearm is stolen will be shut down. More ammunition will be provided to "prove" that firearms owners are a danger. As you must vouch for anyone you take to the club, very, very few people will risk things and even fewer clubs will encourage visitors.

Gun ownership is being attacked and strangled from many directions and few people will be willing to risk introducing anyone to a club, or even discuss that they are firearms owners in case loose talk leads to a break in and theft of a firearm.

Samizdata has a blog entry describing the evolution of the "no right to self defence" (link here: http://tinyurl.com/yf5rz99) and it summarises how and why it is impossible to use a legally held firearm in self defence (besides the conditions on the firearms certificate will state "Only to be used on Approved ranges", or a named piece of land for shooting rabbits etc. so you will be breaking the law by doing so).

So to conclude, the decline in forearms ownership in Britain will only continue, and indeed accelerate as people are forced out of the sport and no new people come into the clubs etc. and those in charge of the system will be quite content to allow this BECAUSE it is what they want. Chairman Mao stated that "Power comes from the barrel of a gun" and there is no way in the world that these people will allow power to be given to the population.

So will there ever be a change in this status? I believe so but as I said at the start of this essay, it will not be PEACEFUL.

There is an interesting book called the War of the Flea by Robert Taber about revolutionary guerrilla warfare. It was published a while ago in the 1960s and the CIA bought up the entire first printing – not because it was so dangerous that the Public couldn't be allowed access to it but it was so good it was issued as a standard text to their operatives. I often used to see it in second hand bookshops in the UK.

One of the questions Taber asked was "Why do people, when the risks and dangers are so great, both to themselves and their families, resort to armed revolution?"

His answer was quite simple – they cannot get any redress to their grievances either through the ballot box or through the Courts.

In the UK such topics as the Lisbon treaty, law and order, taxation, the deliberate encouragement of immigration to destroy the nature of the country, loss of liberties, ID cards, etc. etc. are occurring at an accelerating rate and the average citizen is bewildered by this. The torrent of legislation and the pettiness and disproportionate penalties for trivial transgressions of the law is proceeding unabated. The labour government, through "Enabling Acts" (i.e. under existing legislation a Minister can introduce a law without it being scrutinised or voted on by parliament) has introduced one new criminal offence for EVERY DAY they have been in power since May 1997. Such legislation has given the state unprecedented power to snoop and spy on the population and now it is more expensive to obey the law than to be a criminal.

The citizens do not understand the rules of the game being played by the left. They try to understand and reason their way to a solution – and while they are trying to address and counter the arguments and problems in detail and try to lobby their "representatives", they are overwhelmed by the new legislation coming down the pipeline. The representatives will ignore or trivialise the citizens letter or enquiry – they are driving the process – and will divide and conquer using Critical Theory, accusations of Racism, Homophobia, Islamophobia etc. No matter, it helps destroy and fragment society and isolate people, engender suspicion and any "problems" can be sorted later (such as declaring sections of the population as counter revolutionaries, class enemies, etc. The solution involves firing squads or Gulags but it must be kept firmly in mind that the purpose of it all is for a SMALL group of PROFESSIONAL revolutionaries to run the country for THEIR benefit. See any communist country and the way the leaders behave.

Is there any redress through the ballot box? All political parties are singing from the same hymn sheet and Europe is gaining greater and greater (unelected and unaccountable) powers – see the quote by Mary Ellen Synon above.

Is there any chance of the Law Courts siding with the people of the country and reversing the Governments policies? Again, no. Rather they uphold stupid and malicious legislation. And any situation where it costs you more to obey the law than to disregard it is a dangerous situation. Some of the judgements are frankly bizarre and perverse to say the least and discriminate in favour of "minorities" and against the law abiding (as a "for example" search for "Travellers" on the Daily mail website for dozens of examples of this).

The mood of the people when I left in late January 2009 was becoming increasingly frustrated and angry. Society is so fragmented now that there is no longer a sense of national identity and people now have nothing to lose.

If you accept that Taber was correct (regarding ballot boxes and the law courts) then you must conclude that revolution in the UK is inevitable.

I learned that to avoid trouble, don't be there when it kicks off and I believe that Britain is heading for a revolution of one form or another because the pressures and change in society are so great that it is at breaking point. What will replace that particular version of society is anyone's guess but I can guarantee it will be a less benign, harsher and more impoverished existence. Revolutions destroy wealth and stability and I’m getting too old to start from scratch again. That is why I am writing this in New Zealand.

HOW the revolution starts (without guns in the hands of the people it will be difficult, but not impossible) and what direction it takes I would not like to predict. It will be bloody, long and protracted - but sweeping away of the old regime and the replacement with a new form of governance will be something to observe from afar.

You can bet that those people who have put their life on the line to get rid of the corrupt, non representative and self serving system will not meekly hand in their weapons to those in the new authority. Instead, they will be as brutal as the Communists and quite a few of the existing Politicians, Civil Servants and others will meet an untimely end in one form or another.

So is there hope? That's a strange way of looking at it but perhaps there is.

As usual, you will want to know where the information comes from.

For a concise and easily read summary of the aims and principles of communism, Geoffrey Fairbairn's "Revolutionary Guerrilla Warfare The Countryside Version" is as good as you will get. One chapter on Leninism sums it up completely in 19 pages of a paperback.

Chairman Maos quotes are found in my copy of "Mao Tse Tung – Selected Writings" which is surprisingly readable and well written. Not that I would be persuaded to subscribe to his philosophy.

Lenin's works are too numerous to list in all their gory detail but the following are worthwhile to understand the way communist organisations are set up, organised and run. Note that Lenin had experience of the Army and organisation so if his writings seem to be written as a military textbook, referring to "This Army", now you know why. His acceptance and insistence on the use of overwhelming violence stems from his Military Training and may give an insight into the tactics of the left wing political parties. Try these two as a primer.

On Organisation

Selected Works

Incidentally, if Lenin DID write this stuff, he was an excellent technical author.

Sun Tsu – The Art of War. I prefer the translation by Samuel B Griffiths (a former US Marine) but there are plenty more out there.

The Daily Mail is a large circulation newspaper with over 3 million readers per day (see the Audited Bureau of Circulation Website for exact figures. Make sure you enter the full title as there are thousands of newspapers with Mail as part of the title) and covers some of the stupidities of the various laws passed over the last 13 years. Try entering BNP as a search string in the website and read some of the comments under the articles. Or "Travellers" for the way the law abiding are second class citizens in their own homes.

Samizdata is, I find, patchy and does not cover a single topic (as Kevin's Blog does) but in the right hand sidebar, you can search under TOPICS for self defence etc. Plenty of British points of view.

(Click image for magnified view)

Bolshevism From Moses To Lenin

Communism: A Jewish Talmudic Concept

Jews, Communism, And The Jewish Communists

Behind Communism: The Suppressed Role Of Zionist Jews Behind The Bolshevik Revolution

The New World Order Is Communism

FugaziQuo.Com Library.Com Library: Communism

Is The Holocaust A New 'Religion' With 10 Commandments?

Is The Holocaust A New 'Religion' With 10 Commandments?

(Source)

According to the Israeli philosophy professor Yeshayahu Leibowitz, the 'Holocaust' is a new religion. Leibowitz' countrymen Shraga Elam, Gilad Atzmon, Yoshua Shalev and others have further developed this concept, reasoning like this: Most Jews today are either atheists or shun the religion of Judaism. Therefore, the Jewish people had to adopt belief in the 'Holocaust' as their new religion. They have spread this religion all over the world. 'Holocaust' museums are the new houses of worship and are present in most major cities. The new religion has its commandments, its decrees, its prophets, its high priests, its circle of saints, its rituals and its pilgrimages. It knows neither mercy, nor forgiveness, nor clemency but only the duty of vengeance. If you question the 'Holocaust Religion', you will go to prison.

The 'Ten Commandments' of this 'Holocaust Religion' may be enunciated as follows:

1. Remember what Amalek (the Non-Jews) has done to thee.

2. Thou shalt never compare THE HOLOCAUST with any other Genocide.

3. Thou shalt never compare the Nazi crimes with those of Israel.

4. Thou shalt never doubt the number of 6 million Jewish victims.

5. Thou shalt never doubt that the majority of them died in gas chambers.

6. Thou shalt not doubt the central role of SATAN Hitler in the extermination of the Jews.

7. Thou shalt never doubt the right of Israel to exist as the Jewish state.

8. Thou shalt not criticize the leading Jewish organizations and the Israeli government.

9. Thou must never criticize Jewish organizations and the Zionist leadership for abandoning the European Jewry in the Nazi era.

10.Thou shalt take these commandments literally and never show mercy to them that doubt!

FugaziQuo.Com Library: The Holocaust Hoax

Michael A. Hoffman: Overcoming Orwellian Groupthink (mp3)

William At Five Years Old Has Been Branded A Racist

William At Five Years Old Has Been Branded A Racist
(Source)

Let me tell you about William. He is a very bright child and comes from a nice home. William is extremely polite, courteous and a very normal healthy child. William has a friend called Zoe. She is Asian but William and Zoe are inseparable in the Surrey school they go to near Bagshot.

However last week, Zoe and William had an argument in which William used the term  'Zoe Bin Laden'. Zoe is not a Moslem but a Thomasian Christian, one of the oldest Christian sects in the world alongside the Copts in Egypt.

Zoe's mother, Maria, received a phone call about a very serious matter indeed and it could not be discussed on the phone and the Police might be involved, subject to our discussions today - that is if you come right now?' William's mother Carol also received a phone call about 'a very serious matter'.

Almost panicking, both mothers rushed to the local school. I have changed the locations because the matter is still being investigated. Be content that it is somewhere in Surrey close to where I live. I know both women personally and both are well educated and well balanced. At the school they were almost frogmarched into the presence of the School Manager who sat behind a desk accompanied by a Police Officer - in fact I learned later there were two of them.

William's mother  was already there but her son had been isolated in a special room away from all other children. The school refused to allow his mother access to him. She complained but was only allowed to see a very frightened and tearful little boy after she had been 'interrogated' (in her own words) by the officers and the Manager.

Zoe's mother was made to wait while William's mother was seen first. It was obvious the school were interested in William's other attitudes and that of his father, a car dealer. Eventually she was asked to wait outside and Zoe's mother was asked to go in, where it was explained that the 'very serious matter' concerned her daughter being called 'Zoe Bin Laden'.

Trying not to laugh, Maria asked why should such a trivial childish bit of name calling result in such excessive behaviour by the school? The Manager replied that the school took racist incidents very seriously. The Police were not officially involved at that moment dependent upon their 'preliminary inquiries.'

Maria asked the School Manager if this was 'some kind of prank or perhaps a surprise birthday gram' as it was her 43 birthday? It soon dawned upon her that the school was quite serious.

Maria is rather fiery by nature and does not suffer fools gladly. She like a lot of Indians is quite plain spoken.

'Are you telling me that my daughter’s best friend is being accused of racism?'

'Yes!'

'Are you sick in the head Head Mistress- two five year old children for heaven's sake? A child cannot differentiate between one race and another-  he probably heard it on the radio or TV! Please tell me this is not a wind up?'

'No it is not!'

Maria demanded to see her daughter immediately and despite refusals, the child was eventually brought to her. She took her daughter's hand and removed her from the school. She told the school that she had no intention of returning her and that she would continue to play with William. The school said she could not do this and that matters might be made worse if she did so.

She asked if they were threatening her?

'No but we might have to bring in the social services!'

It was then that she noticed her friend and William’s mother in the room with a crying child.

She entered the 'quiet room' where little William was incarcerated. The Manager tried to stop the friends having contact.

Mary told the woman to 'shut up' and went into see Carol and William. The little boy crying like mad hanging on to his mother for life and clearly terrified said, 'I didn't mean to be naughty mummy and auntie Carol, please tell the teacher that! Please mum ... I didn’t mean to be nasty to Zoe!'

The women immediately took the children despite protests of the school - the Police were clearly embarrassed apparently when it was clear the school was exaggerating - and the women left the school. Neither William or Zoe will be returning.

Yesterday, both mothers received letters from Social Services to make an appointment to see the families concerned and both are now 'under investigation'. The school also wrote a letter to Zoe stating that William's remarks would 'remain on his school record'.

In English Law a child under 10 years is incapable of committing a crime.

This is the UK 2009.

Disgusting!

Seacret A Mossad Front In Australia?

From Whitelaw Towers.....

Please read all of this and help out if you can. This is a recording made February 16, 2009 it was reported on Whitelaw Towers here.

http://whitelawtowers.blogspot.com/2009/02/mossad-alive-and-well-at-shopping_17.html

The original recording was pulled for some strange reason. The intention of this recording is to try and prevent in some small way a possible false flag operation on the Australia's Military Eyes and Ears namely the Electronic Warfare Unit based on the Darling Downs. If something goes down well we have done what we think is the right thing.

Now we are not saying that all employees of Seacret are Mossad. But evidence does suggest that Mossad may be using Israeli Companies as a front. Its not like we haven't heard of the failed attack on a Military base in Sydney now is it. Nothing like a precedent to set the stage. So just have a sticky beak next time you are out shopping with the Mrs. You know the drill milk, bread, Mossad agent:)

We can tell you that the shopping center operation that was interviewed in February packed up and left and didn't return until recently. The guy there now looks even less likely to be a hand cream salesman.

In this day and age of nothing surprises us anymore we offer you this.

Now if you are concerned and you haven't got what it takes to ask questions don't panic. If you feel you need to do something or help out try donating some money to a good cause. Drop in here and help out a fellow Aussie.

http://brendonoconnell.blogspot.com

More Dollars = More Activist Activity.

Here is the original story from Whitelaw Towers.

Mossad alive and well at a Shopping Centre Near You Pt2

Well that didn't take long readers. Our first cab off the rank is from Toowoomba QLD. A little back ground on Toowoomba first. Toowoomba is the largest regional city in Australia and is situated about 120 km west of Brisbane. From what we have been told it has a few strategic bases situated in and around it. In Toowoomba itself we have the 25/49 Darling Downs Infantry Battalion. 20km north of Toowoomba well what do you know we have the Australian Army Navy Air Force Electronic Warfare Unit at Cabala. Interesting, it would seem that they are the eyes and ears of our Defense in Northern Australia. Next we have The Army Aviation stationed at Oakey that is 20km west of Toowoomba. So yeah its a bit of hub for our Defense forces.

Source: YouTube

The Argue With Everyone Forum Is An ADL Honeypot

From Brendon O'Connell....

"We have uncovered and have in our possession, detailed evidence of harassment by the Anti-Defamation League. The ADL are operating out of a political forum called Argue With Everyone. This forum is owned and operated by a Texas-based lawyer named Kevin Kneupper. Concrete proof that Kneupper owns Argue With Everyone is contained in this zip file."

Read the rest here.

The Holocaust: A Student's Guide

The Holocaust: A Student's Guide
by Jim Kerr

"The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God's chosen children and thus, on God Himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded in the Bible; and like it's direct opposite, which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation."

Abraham Foxman - director of Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith - Frontline - January 1994

The results of this survey show that the brainwashing currently taking place in British schools regarding the Holocaust™, isn't working. This outcome will have surely delivered a blow to the myriad of Holocaust propagandists who, despite their best efforts, are evidently not succeeding in their mission objective of keeping alive the main raison d'être for the Zionist state of Israel.

In order to perpetuate the Holocaust myth, Jewish propagandists and their sympathisers are compelled to use the state education system to implant their propaganda in the minds of young British students because the seemingly endless list of Holocaust 'survivors' aren't going to be surviving for much longer. And when these 'survivors' do finally depart this mortal coil, so too does their 'testimony'. Very soon, there will be no more Holocaust 'survivors' left alive.

Auschwitz though, will be preserved at any cost. The Shoah must go on. You can bet your last shekel that this dilapidated labour camp and tourist attraction will remain standing so that young British students can visit and see for themselves the gas chamber and crematorium 1, both of which are shown to visitors as evidence of the 'mass extermination' of Jews that supposedly took place there. It is extremely doubftul though, whether young British students and tourists will be told that these particular sections of the labour camp were built AFTER the second world war had ended. In 2006, the International Auschwitz Council decided to modernise what they say is a 51-year-old exhibition at the Auschwitz labour camp so to prevent the ruins of gas chambers from sinking into the ground. Do the math!

I wonder what answers would be forthcoming if one were to assemble a group of schoolkids and ask them if they knew that the Nazis made soap out of Jews, if they were aware of lampshades having been made from the skin of Jews, or if they had ever heard of hair shaven from prisoners at Auschwitz being used to make textiles. I also wonder what response would be given if one where to ask whether they believed the Anne Frank diary to be true, or just another Holocaust myth. Anyone reading this piece who might have previously believed any of these hoaxes, or in the mythical holocaust itself, can always blame their imagination for the lapse.

Some pro-Israel gay Canadian named Fred states in his blog that education in the UK is "getting worse by the minute", and advocates Holocaust 'education'. Although the British education system does indeed have many shortcomings, the results of the poll undertaken by the London Jewish Cultural Centre indicate that those who are pushing Jewish propaganda on our kids via Holocaust 'education' aren't succeeding in getting their message across. Whether this is directly attributable to the inherent failings of the state education system, or down to young Britons being completely uninterested in events that occurred over sixty years ago is a moot point, although I'd bet on the latter scenario being the case.

Fred is right to advocate Holocaust education. Our children need to learn about how questioning the holocaust came to be considered a thought-crime. They need to learn why it is not against the law for anyone to deny that nineteen hijackers commandeered two passenger jets and flew them into the World Trade Centre, or for anyone to deny that American astronauts landed on the moon. Our kids need to learn why it is not a crime to deny the existence of God almighty, but a crime against God to deny the Holocaust. They need to learn why Holocaust thought-crime laws exist in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Israel, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Switzerland and - quite possibly in the future - here in Britain too. British schoolkids need to know why men like Ernst Zundel are imprisoned for speaking the truth while frauds like Elie Wiesel are given a platform and respectability. They need to learn why liars like Herman Rosenblat go free while those who speak the truth go to jail.

If we are to teach our children in a scholarly, academic fashion, then we must ensure that they learn to study competing arguments, and to weigh-up the evidence presented in each before reaching any conclusions. The presentation of one argument to the exclusion of all others is not education but indoctrination. If the horrors of the second world war are to be fully understood, then the full story has to be told. It wasn't just Jews who suffered, although one could be forgiven for thinking otherwise since this is where all the focus is directed. What about the Armenian holocaust, the Ukranian holocaust and the Cambodian Holocaust? What about the German Holocaust? What of the Indian Holocaust? And what about the murder of millions of Christians and gentiles in Russia and Eastern Europe by Judaic Communists? Did the victims of these Holocausts not suffer?

Given that the world has not long emerged from a century of Holocausts, one must ask why all the aforementioned Holocausts have been omitted from the national curriculum. Do these glaring omissions not constitute Holocaust denial? Why has Jewish suffering been given an elevated status? Abraham Foxham, director of the Anti-Defamation League provides the answer.

According to Foxman, the Holocaust is "something different." For Foxman, the Holocaust "is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God's chosen children and thus, on God Himself." In Foxman's perverted view, Jewish suffering during the second world war is a somehow unique phenomenon. It is not. 56,125,262 people lost their lives as a consequence of world war two. Even if we accept six million as a true figure for the amount of Jewish losses, that figure would represent just over 9% of the death count. Foxman pays great disrespect to the the gentiles whose lives were claimed by the second world war when he claims that Jewish losses were "something different". They were not.

Foxman's claim of the Jews being God's "chosen" people is bogus. Only 20% of world Jewry has the right to legitimately call itself Jewish. The overwhelming majority of 'Jews' are actually the descendants of eastern Europeans, and not descendants of Abraham, but don't expect young British students to ever be taught anything about four-fifths of modern-day Jews being the descendants of the Khazars - converts to Judaism. Just as Jews consider the Holocaust to be "something different", they also perceive themselves with same warped vision. The Judaic claim of them being "God's chosen people" implies that God has given the Jews a privileged position which places them at the very top of the human pecking-order. But this falsehood is easily debunked.

Since the Jews are not a race, how then has it been possible for their 'special' status to have been maintained over several millenniums? Having already eliminated the option of this having been achieved genetically, and since the state of Israel did not exist prior to its' creation by UN charter in 1948, the only other possibile explanation that remains is that the Jews have preserved their 'special' status over the course of thousands of years via religious means. However, the Mizrahi Jews - otherwise known as Oriental Jews - are the direct descendants of the Jews who existed in biblical times, and since Palestinians believe that they are descended from these ancient Jews; if it is true that the 'chosen people' status is genetically transmitted, then the Palestinians are the chosen ones, not the Jews. The claim of the Jews being "God's chosen people" is demonstrably false, and something that young British students need to learn.

Although the standard of numerical skills being taught in British schools is undeniably quite atrocious, Jewish maths is more atrocious still. In January 1988, a German Television broadcast, "Vor Vierzig Jahren", contained an entire newsreel titled "Welt im Filmthat". This German newsreel had been released forty years earlier, and contained a report which focused on the closing scenes of the Krakow Auschwitz Trial that took place in the latter part of 1947. The report stated that: "altogether nearly 300,000 people from the most different nations died in the Auschwitz concentration camp." The plaque pictured below was on display at the Auschwitz labour camp between 1948 and 1989. The obvious question here is: where did the extra 3.7 million dead Jews appear from?

And the obvious question that one must ask after observing the plaque pictured below - presently on display at Auschwitz - is: why have two and-a-half million dead Jews disappeared?

Although this plaque commemorates 1.5 million Jews who are said to have died at Auschwitz, in 1996, however, Polish authorities reduced their estimate of the Auschwitz death count from four million to just over one million although the Polish government has since revised the figure yet again and upped it to 1.5 million. How ironic it is that Holocaust revisionists are persecuted while revsionism has quite evidently been undertaken by 'official' revisionists. So, how many Jews did actually perish at Auschwitz? Decide for yourself after perusing the information to be found here. You can choose any number between 135,000 and 9,000,000 including that elusive six million figure.

From the front page of the 17th October 1943 edition of the British newspaper The People

It can be seen that the Holocaust 'education' young British students are currently receiving is based on weird science and flawed arithmetic. The knowledge being imparted to young British students in respect of the Holocaust is not being transmitted via education but via indoctrination. For the Holocaust hoax to continue, the Jews and the lackeys who serve their agenda must target young minds early. "Get' em young, keep 'em for life" is the means to this particular end. It is encouraging though, to discover that the Jewish propaganda being implanted in young, fertile British minds is not being fully absorbed by the target audience. Revisionists can draw hope and endeavour to make sure that the truth prevails. Who knows, maybe at some future point we'll be hearing of how kids think Auschwitz is a type of hoax.

Michael A. Hoffman: Overcoming Orwellian Groupthink (mp3)

WW1: What Happened? - Part1

WW1: What Happened? - Part 1
by Michael Stewart and Jim Kerr

The first half of this production features the late Norman Dodd, who in 1953 was the chief investigator for Congressman Reece's Special Committee On Tax Exempt Foundations. The clip is an excerpt taken from a 1982 interview conducted by G. Edward Griffin in which Dodd testifies as to how both the Carnegie Endowment For International Peace ("Peace", according to Karl Marx "is the lack of opposition to Socialism") and the Rockefeller Foundation actively sought America's involvement in the first world war via the infiltration and subsequent subversion of the U.S. State Department. Dodd also tells of of the hidden agenda of these elitist organisationd to rewrite American and world history after the war had ended.

Aside from the Carnegie Foundation's activity that saw American participation in the first world war - as testified by Norman Dodd - further insight is provided courtesy of Benjamin Freedman who speaks of the significant and pivotal role of the Zionist Federations of the world in securing American involvement. Benjamin Freedman - formerly known as Benjamin Freidman - was a Zionist sympathiser prior to him discovering its' true ambitions whereupon he committed the remaining years of his life and fortune attempting to educate the American people about the perils of Zionism and the power they wield over the entire U.S. government. The second half of this video production is given to a pertinent excerpt from the famous 1961 speech that Freedman gave at the Willard Hotel, Washington D.C. before an audience of concerned American patriots.

Benjamin Freedman articulately narrates a historically accurate account of how the World Zionist Federations contrived certain events that led to America's involvement in world war one. Freedman also describes the 'prize' that the Zionist Federations of the world received as a result of them manipulating the Americans to participate in the war that was supposed "to end all wars". The Zionists' 'prize' was the Balfour Declaration whereby Great Britain - then the occupying force in Palestine - 'permitted' the total "Jewish" colonisation of Palestine which was to ultimately lead to the 'birth' of the State of "Israel" in 1948. It must be stated that without the input of Zionist stooge Adolf Hitler there would be no Israel. Using the time-honoured trick of the 'Hegelian dialect', Hitler and the Nazis fomented "anti-Semitism" so that European Jews could be rounded-up and processed, with those deemed "fit" being transported to Palestine to populate the long envisioned State of "Israel", while those who were deemed "useless", genetically inferior and/or opposed the move were murdered.

A zip-file 2.7 megabytes in size containing some of the resources used during the research of this video is available for download.

A Propaganda Extravaganza

A Propaganda Extravaganza

by Michael Stewart & Jim Kerr

To "commemorate" the 5th anniversary of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Centre, the History Channel in Australia went on what could only be described as a "propaganda extravaganza". Throughout the day of the 11th September 2006, unsuspecting viewers were presented with three 'documentaries' played back-to-back in the manner of a never ending 'loop'.

The first 'documentary' shown was "Loose Change - Second Edition" - a film that purports to 'expose' the U.S. government's involvement and complicity in the event which became known as '9/11'. The second film shown that day was "Auschwitz: Nazi's and The Final Solution" wherein it is claimed that 6 million Jews were "exterminated". The third film in the 'loop' was "Attack on The Pentagon", a 'documentary' that reiterates the official conspiracy theory of American Airlines Flight 77 being hijacked by 'Arabs' before being flown into the most heavily-fortified military installation on the face of the earth. The producers appear to be unaware of the news reports that were aired on September 11, 2001 by CNN wherein it was stated that no plane had actually struck the Pentagon.

It should be understood that this video does not attempt to debunk the official version of events of September 11 2001. To do so would be a waste of time and a pointless exercise given that the official story of 9-11 already lies in tatters from a multitude of perspectives, simple logic and hard facts. Nor is this presentation an attempt to debunk the official narratives of certain historical events that took place around the time of World War two because - like 9/11 - there already exists copious amounts of available material, albeit suppressed, that make it abundantly clear history has been falsified so to justify certain events. These events can be plainly seen sixty years later via the reality of the bloodshed that is currently taking place in the middle east. Indeed, the bloodletting was taking place in the middle east even before the Rothschild-funded Zionist state of Israel had been formally created.

'A Propaganda Extravaganza' merely throws light upon a small but pertinent 'segment' of the blatant propaganda with which we have been incessantly bombarded en masse from the point (shortly after the end of the contrived first world war) that it was formally decided history needed to be rewritten, courtesy of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Rockefeller Foundation.

There will be some who might struggle to accept the truth of the clarifications that appear in yellow text within the 'ticker-tape' banner throughout the History Channel's own portion of this presentation. Visiting the links provided below would be a good point to begin your own research. Don't take our word for it. Further clarifications of some important misunderstandings are brought to us courtesy of the late William Cooper who, in a nutshell, offers a concise explanation of what in reality the U.S. government actually is, along with an explanation of what and who it most certainly is not.

A zip-file 4.2 megabytes in size containing some of the resources used during the research of this video is available for download.

Wiped Off The Map

Wiped Off The Map by Jim Kerr

Although Israeli shills and trolls continue to spew forth their perfidious propaganda in the manner of a gramophone needle stuck in the groove, they cannot, however, poison the well of truth because the camera does not lie. And despite Israel having prevented the global media from witnessing the carnage and devastation that the Israeli military wrought in Gaza, incontrovertible evidence of the barbaric war crimes committed in Gaza by the Zionist state is there for all the world to see and judge accordingly.

There is ample evidence of the Israeli war crimes committed in Gaza and even though this inconvenient fact cannot be denied, Israel and her legions of stooges, apologists, shills and Internet trolls will, of course, become further detached from reality and deny all charges then claim that they are the victims; not the Palestinians whose homes have been razed by Israeli bulldozers and whose children have been burned to the bone by the illegal use of white phosphorus and mercilessly slaughtered by the bombs and bullets bought and paid for by the always-generous American taxpayer.

The unholy trinity of Olmert, Livni and Barak ought to be arrested, tried at the Hague, then executed for their crimes against humanity. But no such thing will happen and Olmert, Livni and Barak will get off scot-free - as Israeli war criminals inevitably do. It's about time these psychopathic butchers were removed from power and brought to justice.

Remember...Saddam got the rope for less.

Thirteen Editorial Rules For Middle East Reporting

Thirteen Editorial Rules For Middle East Reporting by Michael Hoffman

1) In the Middle East it is always the Arabs who attack first and always Israel that is defending themselves. This defense is called a reprisal.

2) The Arabs, Palestinian or Lebanese have no right to kill civilians. That is called “terrorism.”

3) Israel has the right to kill civilians. That is called “legitimate defense.”

4) When Israel kills civilians en masse, the western powers claim that it is more measured. This is called “reaction of the international community.”

5) The Palestinians and the Lebanese have no right to capture soldiers of Israel inside military installations with sentries and combat posts. This is called, “Kidnapping of defenseless people.”

6) Israel has the right to kidnap anytime and anywhere as many Lebanese and Palestinians as they want. Currently there are more than 10 thousand, 300 of whom are children and a thousand are women. No proof of guilt is needed. Israel has the right to keep kidnapped prisoners indefinitely, even if they are authorities democratically elected by the Palestinians. This is called “terrorist prisoners.”

7) When the word Hezbollah is mentioned, it is compulsory in the same sentence to contain the words “supported and financed by Syria and by Iran.”

8) When the word "assassination" is mentioned, it is compulsory to say in the same sentence, "Syria's role in an assassination in Lebanon in 2005," and never mention Israel's role in the assassination of Elie Hobeika in Lebanon in 2002 (shortly before Hobeika was to testify in Belgium concerning Ariel Sharon's war crimes).

9) When you mention “Israel” it is forbidden to make any mention of the words “supported and financed by the U.S.” This may give the impression that the conflict is uneven and that Israel’s existence is not in danger.

10) When referring to Israel, expressions that are prohibited include: 'Occupied Territories', 'UN resolutions', 'Violations of human rights' or 'Geneva Convention'.

11) Both the Palestinians and the Lebanese are always “cowardly,” they are hidden among the civilian population, which does not want them. If they sleep in their homes and live with their families, they are using "human shields." Israel has a right to destroy with bombs and missiles the homes, apartment blocs and neighborhoods where they are sleeping. This is called a “precision surgical operation.”

12) The Israelis speak better English, French, Spanish or Portuguese than the Arabs. Therefore they and those who support them must be interviewed more and have more opportunities than the Arabs to explain the present Rules of the Editorial Staff (from 1 to 11) to the general public. That is called “journalistic neutrality.”

13) All those who are not in accordance with the preceding editorial rules are “highly dangerous anti-Semitic bigots and terrorist sympathizers."